Where SmartCon360 differs from competitors

Three concrete differences — all from the code:

1. Takt-native architecture. In most software, planning is a Gantt and takt is a view added later. We do the opposite: the core data model is TaktPlan, TaktZone (per-zone takt override = LBMS sub-takt), TaktWagon (a fixed-duration time box), Activity (a wagon × zone cell). The word "Gantt" never appears in the schema — the Timeline is just a visualization of the same takt data.

2. BIM → WBS/LBS automation, for real. QTOOrchestrator is a 10-step deterministic pipeline: open the IFC with ifcopenshell → extract quantities → classify → WBS hierarchy → LBS hierarchy → takt zones. This is what actually reduces manual WBS entry.

3. Contract intelligence. For FIDIC, 4 contract books + a policy resolver.

Honest limits: ICMS is absent entirely; a standalone critical-path engine like MS Project/P6 is deliberately not there — the philosophy is flow-based, not activity-based.

Do you think takt-based planning is genuinely superior to Gantt on repetitive structures?