Blog
An introductory series explaining SmartCon360 from the code, with evidence. Not polish — proof.
- 01May 31, 2026
What SmartCon360 is — and why I'm writing a series
On a construction site, planning lives in Primavera, cost in Excel, BIM in another program. That disconnect is the real cost of projects. SmartCon360 unifies it on a single platform.
Read more → - 02June 4, 2026
SmartCon360 — what works today, what's deferred
The disease of construction-software marketing: everything works in the demo, nothing on site. I do the opposite — I clearly separate what's live from what's on the roadmap.
Read more → - 03June 9, 2026
SmartCon360's technology choices — and why
Stack choices give away a product's values. Next.js, FastAPI, ifcopenshell, and one critical principle: quantities never come from an LLM.
Read more → - 04June 11, 2026
Where SmartCon360 differs from competitors
Three concrete differences — all from the code: a takt-native architecture, real BIM→WBS/LBS automation, and multi-standard compliance. With their honest limits.
Read more → - 05June 16, 2026
SmartCon360 roadmap — phased, evidence-based growth
Good engineering products aren't built in one shot — they're built in phases on a solid core. This week's deliveries and the next steps.
Read more → - 06June 18, 2026
SmartCon360's most mature parts — what's genuinely solid
Last time I wrote the gaps openly. Now the other side of the coin — what's mature and tested in production: the BIM pipeline, 42 reports, the man-hour engine, LPS.
Read more → - 07June 23, 2026
SmartCon360 — 42 reports, one design language
In construction, reporting is scattered across most products: every module produces its own format. We built a single deterministic report engine — 42 generators, one shared design.
Read more → - 08June 25, 2026
SmartCon360's real claim: unifying four methodologies
Are AWP, Lean, Takt and LBMS actually linked in one product, or just four separate layers sitting side by side? Because value only emerges if they truly integrate.
Read more →